The Truth We Need To Know
Unleashing the hard facts and truth so you can be free of deceptions and live your life to the full!
If you enjoy reading this my latest book, could you please consider subcribing so I can bring you more in-depth and highly researched content. Just Click on the Subcribe button while this content is FREE
Now to my book,
We are twenty months - actually almost two years since the U.K. Prime Minister announced that there was a mysterious virus causing havoc across the Continent and in China, and we should respond accordingly. To that end of responding to the Covid-19 virus, Boris Johnson used coercion and pure fear utilizing the full force of Government propaganda, as the above example shows:
Let's not forget it was the U.K. taxpayers who funded these placards which were pasted on thousands of buses and bus-stops etc, amounting to in excess of £184m on communications relating to Covid-19 in 2020, figures from the Cabinet Office show.
It spent £171.9m on media activity via Manning Gottlieb OMD last year, while MullenLowe UK, which handles the majority of coronavirus advertising, was paid £12.2m. Source:Campaign Live
From the start when this pandemic hit, just like in any major war, the first casualty was the truth.
At the time, the problem with the Government’s response was they were initially reading from the wrong virus rule-book because they were responding from the Government’s rule-book of what to do when there's a flu epidemic or pandemic, not a Covid pathogen. So they got started on the wrong foot and it took them one month to catch up after being wrong-footed. If you don't believe me then read this Link which outlines the grave way the State failed its citizens, in an article published by Unherd, the online site
Here is the scene of a Downing Street Covid-19 Press Conference, with Boris standing in the middle of his two chief science advisors. With Sir Philip Vallance, the Chief Scientific Advisor to the U.K. Government on our left while Professor Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Advisor to the U.K. Government on our right.
The False Specter of Covid-19
A Prime Minster in Meltdown Leading a Nation into Meltdown
Do you believe this man anymore? In other words, would you buy a second-hand car from this man?
We are living in what people call unprecedented times. Yes, they are right. A government has never told its people how often they can leave their home in a day and the reasons for those permissions. Neither has a government banned us from visiting our children or grandchildren, or from going abroad, or told us how many individuals we can invite to our home, how many people we can meet outside when we go to the park or go for a run, how many people we can invite over for a dinner and whether our visitors can use our toilet or not.
Yes, we are definitely living in unprecedented times where a nation's people were even banned from hugging their granny at the 2020 Christmas, before Boris finally cancelled Christmas festivities for the entire London area and Kent and Essex.
Please let us not forget:
WHEN COVID-19 HIT THE WORLD BETWEEN JANUARY AND MARCH, 2020:
THIS WORLD WAS CHANGED ALMOST OVERNIGHT - EITHER BY FEAR OR SOMETHING MORE SINISTER,
OR BOTH, CERTAINLY MY COUNTRY WAS, EXPLICITLY!
Whatever it was that changed the very fabric and atmosphere of my nation, Britain, one thing we are sure of is, we are living in unprecedented times, so unprecedented in fact, that I would call this age, a Universal Age of Deceit, of which this, here, Blog of mine is Revolutionary because I believe, on the whole, I can say it speaks truth, and that means,
I AM A REVOLUTIONARY,
IN AN AGE OF DECEIT,
As it is claimed George Orwell wrote,
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
Or as the French socialist Jean Jaurès said in 1898,
“When a society, when an institution, lives only by lies, truth is revolutionary.”
Why?
BECAUSE THIS IS THE AGE OF GROUPTHINK.
From the very beginning of this pandemic, the politicians highjacked the truth, and suddenly the politicians were in the role of our science experts while our expert scientists were in the role of our politicians; and in the middle of this fray was the truth, which in any war of information and misinformation, is the first casualty. And the politicians claimed they were being guided by the science while the scientists were being controlled by the politicians, telling them what to say; therefore, the first casualty in the U.K. from the Covid-19 pandemic was the truth - and I write this and say this, with first, a heavy heart for all those who have so tragically, and so painfully for their families, died.
Yes, something isn't right with this so-called Covid-19 pandemic - THERE'S SOMETHING VERY FISHY GOING ON - IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT A VIRUS! (By the way, may I just interrupt your reading to inform you that I have published a book with this subtitle - if you're interested, you can find at the following Link which is a Kindle Edition from Amazon:
Escape From Big Brother, There's Something Very Fishy Going On - It's Not Just About a Virus.)
LET ME TELL YOU THE CRAZY THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE NAME OF OUR HEALTH WHICH DON’T MAKE SENSE,
I like to categorize these GIANT claims by the Government as GROUPTHINKS. I am sure you are aware that in George Orwells novel “1984” he coins the word, “Groupthink” for when describing the ruling authority's “Dictate” that everyone must follow - wholeheartedly and unreservedly; in regard to the U.K. Government, some call them “lies” which are utilized by the Government to serve their agenda. I don't have full- proof evidence that all of the following GROUPTHINKS are lies or definitely intentional lies, but the most I can say is, where I do claim them to be lies, I cite a reference or Link to back up my claim, and otherwise each of these GROUPTHINKS are evidence of what's called a Mission-Creep, where, for the sake of these politician's agenda, the Government's goalposts keep moving. So we have to ask the questions,
WHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS?
ARE THEY MOTIVATED BY A SECRET AGENDA, EVEN A GLOBALIST LEFTIST, SOCIALIST AGENDA?
NUMBER 1 GROUPTHINK:
“WASH YOUR HANDS WHILE SINGING ‘GOD SAVE THE QUEEN’ THROUGH TWICE.”
This was said, at least once in my ear via my phone by the right honourable Jacob Rees-Mogg, MP, and Leader of the House.
At the very beginning of 2020 - in January and February, the Government were reading the wrong safety response book, i.e. instead of how to respond to a pandemic they were reading about, Hands, Space, ….,, from how to respond to a national flu epedemic.
At first, the Government didn't ban large crowds, they didn't know this virus was airbourne but they just thought you could catch it from surfaces or by touching and spit, from coughing etc. So, they thought that this virus wasn't airbourne but could just be caught by surfaces and close-contact (because they were following advice in response to the Flu) - they just said,
WASH YOUR HANDS, KEEP YOUR SPACE, SAVE THE N.H.S.
NUMBER 2 GROUPTHINK:
“We are following the Science.”
First, during that very first Covid-19 Downing Street announcement, when Boris stood between his two top scientists, he stated, “We are following the science!” When the virus first hit the U.K. at the beginning of March, 2020, the Government responded with their Flu-Response-Book, so that's why they were one month late to call for a National Lockdown compared with most of the countries in Europe.
And then, after a month when the Government seemed to be pursuuing herd-immunity, Boris finally succumbed to the pressure and announced the first National Lockdown.
Then in spite of Boris still insisting that they were following the science of National mandated mitigation by social distancing and lockdowns, actually the real science of herd-immunity was going in the other direction - which Sweden seemed to validate as a better policy. Now, after 20 months later, in which Sweden never had a national lockdown, but instead pursued the policy of “herd-immunity”, doesn’t the results of just 15,142 deaths in Sweden, as of the date of my Blog, here, on the 25th November, 2021, validate their science, while damning Boris’ and his two scientists’ mantra of “WE ARE FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE!”? Since, in the U.K. from today, the number of deaths from Covid-19 is 144,000. Source: Death by Covid-19 Statistics
Especially, when over two hundred scientists from the most prestigious universities and hospitals in the U.K. and around the world signed the statement that herd-immunity was a better policy rather than lockdowns and national, mandated restrictions. Their statement is called, “The Barrington Declaration” which you can find here on their websiteThe Great Barrington Declaration with other information, which states the following in:
The Great Barrington Declaration:
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
NUMBER 3 GROUPTHINK:
“Only three weeks to flatten the curve.”
Let's analyse this third, Groupthink:
I would like to quote from the article published online by, Anti-Empire written by Ribe Slane who writes the following - whose text from the Link Anti-Empire articles you can distinguish here:
Let’s just begin with looking at where the claim originally came from. It was made by the Prime Minister, in the speech he made to the nation on 23rd March, just hours before the country went into lockdown. Here is what he said:
“I can assure you that we will keep these restrictions under constant review. We will look again in three weeks, and relax them if the evidence shows we are able to.”
It is well known that the decision by the Government to implement lockdown was based to a large degree on the model produced by Imperial College. This model, also known as the Neil Ferguson model, was published in their “Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand”, which you can find here.
But what did the report actually say about timelines for lockdowns and the easing of them? Although the report only uses the word lockdown once, it refers to suppressions and mitigation strategies, which include household quarantine, case isolation, social distancing, and school and university closure. These terms are therefore basically synonymous with lockdown, and here are some key quotes, with the most crucial parts highlighted in bold:
“When examining mitigation strategies, we assume policies are in force for 3 months, other than social distancing of those over the age of 70 which is assumed to remain in place for one month longer.” (p.6)
“Suppression strategies are assumed to be in place for 5 months or longer.” (p.6)
“Given suppression policies may need to be maintained for many months” (p.11)
“This means it is difficult to be definitive about the likely initial duration of measures which will be required, except that it will be several months.” (p.15)
“The major challenge of suppression is that this type of intensive intervention package – or something equivalently effective at reducing transmission – will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more)” (p.2)
“The main challenge of this approach is that NPIs need to be maintained … for as long as the virus is circulating in the human population, or until a vaccine becomes available. In the case of Covid-19, it will be at least a 12-18 months before a vaccine is available.”
You get the picture. These quotes make it crystal clear that Imperial College assumed lockdown would be in place for many months — perhaps 12-18 months or even more. Furthermore, since this model and the strategy it suggested was the basis for the Government’s decision to put the country under lockdown, it is utterly inconceivable that Mr Johnson and his Government did not know at the time that these policies would be in place for months, perhaps years.
In which case, what can we say of Mr Johnson’s assurance to the British people that, “we will look again in three weeks, and relax them if the evidence shows we are able to.” Since he knew what the model said about how long the policies would need to be in place, it was an assurance he knew full well was utterly misleading. At the very least, he gave absolutely no hint that these policies would need to be in place for months or years.
As I mentioned at the start, I was aware of this at the time of his speech, as I had looked at the Ferguson report when it was released. However, I would guess that it might come as a surprise to the British people, particularly as these measures, which were sold to them on an essentially false basis, have set us on a path of social, economic, legal, psychological, and I would add constitutional collapse.
Just one more thing. Here is another extraordinarily interesting nugget from the Ferguson report:
“Once interventions are relaxed (in the example in Figure 3, from September onwards), infections begin to rise, resulting in a predicted peak epidemic later in the year. The more successful a strategy is at temporary suppression, the larger the later epidemic is predicted to be in the absence of vaccination, due to lesser build-up of herd immunity.” (p.10)
Read it again and again and ask yourself this: did they put us under lockdown knowing full well that it would reduce immunity in the population, and that they would then implement another lockdown later in the year? If you look at the graphs on page 10 of their report, and see the recent suggestions of a second lockdown coming our way, the answer appears to be unequivocally yes. So not three weeks after all.
Source: The Blog Mire
This Anti-Empire article ends here.
So you can see that it is almost beyond doubt that Boris did read Ferguson's report, and therefore, he knew that the lockdowns would be for m6ch longer - and there would be at least two lockdowns. And if we claim that Boris somehow didn't read Neil Ferguson's report or he was not aware of his words, in which case he would either be gross negligent or gross incompetent, i.e, a foolish act of dereliction of duty, or that Boris is foolish.
AND, OF COURSE, THERE IS THE SINISTER ELEMENT TO CONSIDER:
Some have even gone as far as to give the word “pandemic”its own variant, i.e. "plandemic", and accuse the Government of speaking too many lies - in other words, they have led the British people up too many garden paths.
To be honest with you, I would agree that the Government hasn't been honest with the citizens of the U.K. who pay their wages, their so called masters.
For example, from the time that Boris Johnson first announced with his two scientist advisors on his left and right, that there was a mysterious, airbourne virus which presented such a threat that the way to respond was to close the entire nation, but it would only be for probably three weeks to flatten the curve.
NUMBER 4 GROUPTHINK :
“Everyone must stay at home unless absolutely necessary.”
Boris placed the country in two devasting lockdowns- for everyone involved and for most business-owners who suffered the brunt of the disasterous policy while most of the remaining people could claim compensation from the Government’s Furlough Scheme. These lockdowns were folowed by a system of three-tiered traffic colour system of lockdownsmwhich were eventually abandoned by January of the following year, when a third Lockdown came into place.
NUMBER 5 GROUPTHINK:
“SAVE THE N.H.S. FROM BEING OVERWHELMED!”
The Three Chanted Mantra was,
STAY HOME.
PROTECT THE N.H.S.
SAVE LIVES.
In that priority, i.e. you have to save the N.H.S. not the N.H.S. has to save you.
NUMBER 6 GROUPTHINK:
“We have to keep the R number below 2.”
And then, another one of those Boris from Downing Street Updates:
The idea was to carefully control the R value – the number of people that each infected person would, on average, give the disease to. The idea was to keep it at just above one, so that the disease would slowly spread through the population rather than either burning through it or dwindling down.
Boris Johnson came on T.V. claiming that the key to overcoming this virus and staying out of lockdown was keeping the R number less than 2, the “ R" being the initial of Reproduction, i.e. 1+ 1 = the R number 2. So suddenly, the entire country was at the mercy of the dreaded “ R” number.
NUMBER 7 GROUPTHINK:
“We have a world-beating Tract-and-Trace system to get us out of this pandemic.”
Then one day during his bi-weekly “Questions to the Prime Minister” Boris announced a new scheme: Boris called his new scheme of “Track and Trace "a world leader" of track and trace, of which he poured 60 billion pounds of taxpayers money, then finally he scrapped it a few weeks ago, it should be called, Track and Trace, then Scrap it!
NUMBER 8 GROUPTHINK:
“Everyone Download this N.H.S. App. to beat this Covid-19!”
They then said that the way out of the pandemic was the N.H.S. phone app, oh it's just a phone app.
NUMBER 9 GROUPTHINK:
“TEST EVERYONE USING THE PCR TEST, MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN!”
Then the Government was setting up testing sites all over the place as away to exit this pandemic. To test for a virus which was so powerful and dangerous, you need to test everyone to see whether they have it. A virus so powerful you have to test every healthy person to see if they have it.
Oh! What a complicated web of deceit they weave, when at first they set out to deceive!
Something very fishy is going on.
Then the vaccine arrived for the new year of 2021, at the end of December and they said:
NUMBER 10 GROUPTHINK:
“The vaccine is the way out of this pandemic by just jabbing the over 60s. and vulnerable, first.”
They said, “15 million jabs to Freedom!” But after 15 million jabs, they said that the way out of the pandemic was if the 50-60 years old, then 40-50s then 30-40s, then under 30s…., then 20s to 30s.
Then 18-20s
Then between 16-17s.
Then 9-15s.
Next will be under 9s.
And the under 5s,
Which those last two age groups are aready having trial vaccinations or experimented vaccinations.
Then, after they achieved 90% vaccination, they are now, going against the Government’s own Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, they are now vaccinating 9-15 year olds.
Do you notice a pattern here?
So many moved goalposts,
and Lies, lies, and more lies in the name of protecting our health!
Oh! What a complicated web of deceit they weave, when at first they set out to deceive!
And now the Government are insusting, and introducing draconinan ways to coerce the over 65 year olds to get their booster jab, as well as setting up vaccine programs to give every man, woman and child a booster jab.
NUMBER 11 GROUPTHINK:
“Keep getting your booster jab perpetually, otherwise we will find ways of excluding you from society.”
Whst is becoming clearer and clearer is that the U.K. Governmemt have to meet their vaccine quotas, otherwise these vaccine companies they have signed contracts with can sue them and they can be penalized. So, of course, their agenda is not your health but rather for making money or avoid being sued and having to pay out millions of your money, i.e. taxper-payers money. Just like with any corruption, the way to get to the truth is follow the money. Follow the money and find out who Boris and his wife are being supported by, who they and his Government Ministerx are in the pockets of by big Pharma companies and Globalist networks whose agenda is the same as Boris, his wife and other allies such as Joe Biden who also shares the exactly same political slogan:
NUMBER 12 GROUPTHINK:
“BUILD BACK BETTER.”
And if you need more evidence that our world has gone crazy.
If you look at the following image of a donut, this is what this company and others are offering as an incentive to take a vaccine. This is what multiple companies are doing right now to give an incentive, if you could say coerce people into getting a vaccine
Can you imagine your local GP telling you when they prescribe you tablets for your collesterol that if you take these new “wonder-drug” pills, they will give you a donut or a Mcdonald burger to take the tablets? But that's exactly what they are doing with this Covid-19 vaccines. Macdonalds, and donut companies, such as the one in the following image, are actually bribing you to take the vaccine.
This is yet more evidence that the Government has socially distanced itself from the truth and shows that what's really going on behind all this Covid-19 business is a crazy agenda; if you are being coerced to take a vaccine with donuts and burgers or if they need to coerce you with these things for a medical procedure than the vaccine they are trying to give you may be for another agenda not your freedom from Covid-19 it's very fishy - it means, it is very likely not good for you!
But they are yet more lies we need to expose, which they use to get as many jabs into peoples’ arms, including children.
When the Government coerces, cajoles, bribes, threatens your job and forces you to take a medical procedure which invades your right to personal body-autonomy, you can be assured that receiving it is detrimental to your health. And their many priority it to keep stoking the coals of their fires at THE MINISTRY OF FEAR, i.e. at the THE MINISTRY OF LIES, they call THE MINISTY OF TRUTH.
I find it so disparaging but not surprising that whenever the Government’s ministers for health stand up in the House of Parliament every question is given the same old GROUPTHINK or rather NEWSPEAK:
GET YOUR BOOSTER COVID-19 VACCINE.
WEAR YOUR MASK.
SUPRESS THE VIRUS.
PROTECT THE N.H.S.
AND GET AS MANY PEOPLE TESTED SO THE NUMBER OF CASES CAN CONTINUE TO RISE SO THAT WE CAN KEEP STOKING THE MINISTRY OF FEAR OF SAGE AND NERVETAG.
Until the NEVER NEVERLAND JUST UP AYONDER:
Freedom.
The Conclusion: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH OF THIS GROUPTHINK AND MISSION-CREEP!
IT'S TIME TO STAND UP TO THESE LIES WITH THE TRUTH, which, of course is, in times of universal deceit, a revolutionary act.